本文为大家带来雅思写作题目之政府是否应该设立图书馆：Some people think that the government should establish free libraries in each town. Others, however, believe that it is a waste of money since the public can use the Internet at home to obtain information. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
雅思写作题目讲解：
这回试题难不倒烤鸭。冲突的焦点落在[有必要设立图书馆]或[没有必要]，而不是单一的立场library PK Internet。在家使用因特网的好处太多，可是利用图书馆可以补足其功能complementary。
两个问题。引言3 sentences之后，1. 讨论二者的利弊，看中体的承段6 sentences与转6 sentences段。2. 考生提出看法，看合段的结论3 sentences。
起段引言 Introduction
开头第一句。申论主题：使用因特网可以取得各种资讯Vs.图书馆对大众有利。
开头第二句。集中焦点：冲突是两难自解。
开头第三句。一分为二：分头指引讨论二者利弊。
雅思写作范文：
The public can still benefit from visiting libraries, even though these days access to the Internet can provide all kinds of information. To enhance the quality of research, it is better to make the most of both modern Web-based and traditional library resources. Establishing free libraries in each town makes sense since the use of a computer at home has its own weaknesses as well as its indisputable strengths.
公众仍然可以从访问图书馆中受益，即使现在上网可以提供各种信息。要提高研究质量，就要充分利用现代网络和传统图书馆资源。在每个城镇建立免费图书馆是有意义的，因为家里使用计算机有它自己的弱点和无可争辩的优点。
At this information age, the diversified advantages of using the Internet are only too obvious. Online resources can be obtained from all over the world 24 hours a day, seven days a week while a library's publications cannot provide up-to-minute information the way Web sites can. The Internet gives users opportunities for two-way communication through Facebook, Twitter, E-mail, MSN, among other electronic devices. Some sites feature rare books, documents and special collections that traditionally have been only available in libraries. Almost at no cost and merely a few clicks away, the public can read newspapers, magazines, journals and encyclopedias, no matter when or where. Furthermore, the Internet offers a completemultimedia experience--texts, video, audio, hyperlinks and graphics, etc. all at once, but such advantages often cannot be expected from town libraries.
在这个信息时代，使用互联网的多元化优势太明显了。网上资源可以一天24小时、一周7天从世界各地获得，而图书馆的出版物不能像网站那样提供最新的信息。互联网为用户提供了通过Facebook、Twitter、电子邮件、MSN等电子设备进行双向通信的机会。一些网站的特色是稀有的书籍、文档和特殊收藏，这些传统在图书馆中是唯一可用的。几乎不花钱，只要点击几下，公众就可以阅读报纸、杂志、期刊和百科全书，无论何时何地。此外，互联网同时提供了完整的多媒体体验——文本、视频、音频、超链接和图形等，但是这些优势通常不能从城市图书馆获得。
On the other hand, money spent on public libraries is certainly worth it. To start with, knowledgeable librarians can be of practical help when it comes to offering professional advice about research on particular topics. A government-financed library is supposed to use universal cataloging systems that classify and organize all resources so that it is easier for a user to locate specific information without being led to non-productive research. Whereas most Web sites provide materials characteristic of current information, only a library well-funded by public money can house printed copies that date back many decades. In addition, computers in libraries also offer free Internet connection and other electronic resources, such as reference CD-ROMs. Now that anyone can create a Web site, reliability of information on the Internet is not guaranteed, and as such there are cases in which the Internet is no substitute for the library.
另一方面，花在公共图书馆上的钱当然是值得的。首先，知识渊博的图书馆员可以提供关于特定主题研究的专业建议。政府资助的图书馆应该使用对所有资源进行分类和组织的通用编目系统，以便用户更容易定位特定信息，而不必进行非生产性研究。尽管大多数网站都提供具有当前信息特点的材料，但只有由公共资金资助的图书馆才能收藏几十年前的印刷品。此外，图书馆的计算机还提供免费的互联网连接和其他电子资源，如参考光盘。既然任何人都可以创建网站，互联网上的信息的可靠性就不能得到，因此，在某些情况下，互联网不能代替图书馆。
Money being not the issue, the government ought to have the wisdom of establishing free libraries in each community despite the fact that people can use the Internet at home or elsewhere. For quality research, libraries and the Internet are complementing each other. Were information food for the hungry mind, one might as eat out sometimes as eat at home, and at this point nobody ever ask questions whether to have "free" restaurants in town.
钱不是问题，政府应该有智慧在每个社区建立免费图书馆，尽管人们可以在家里或其他地方使用互联网。对于质量研究来说，图书馆和互联网是相互补充的。如果信息食品是饥饿的头脑，一个人也许有时在外面吃饭就像在家里吃饭，在这一点上，没有人问过是否要在城里有“免费”餐馆。
.png)
